Saturday, April 24, 2010

Anger builds over Arizona law

Angela Stoutenburgh reports from Arizona on the impact of a sweeping new anti-immigrant law--and the response it provoked from opponents who believe that "no human being is illegal."

Protesters march against SB 1070 outside the Arizona Capitol Building in Phoenix (Art Foxall | UPI)Protesters march against SB 1070 outside the Arizona Capitol Building in Phoenix (Art Foxall | UPI)

WITHIN HOURS of Arizona's racist immigration bill being signed into law on April 23, thousands of people across the state began taking to the streets against SB 1070--the strictest immigration law in the country.

Phoenix, the state's capitol, saw several demonstrations over April 23-25, as hundreds--and in some cases, several thousands--of immigrant rights defenders turned out against the new law. As many as 2,000 students walked out of several Phoenix high schools in protest. Other demonstrations occurred in cities across the state, and furious immigrant rights supporters around the U.S. met and organized a response to this latest assault.

Ramon Garcia, an activist who traveled to Phoenix from Tucson to take part in a rally of several thousand on April 24, told Reuters, "I feel very strongly that the law is extremely unconstitutional and racist, and it violates both human and civil rights."

Another 3,500 protesters turned out the following day in Phoenix. Wearing T-shirts that read "Legalize Arizona" and carrying signs saying "We are human" and "We have rights," protesters called for the Obama administration to block the law by passing federal immigration reform, and for activists to carry out civil disobedience, if necessary, to oppose the unjust law.

As Dr. Warren Stewart, pastor of the First Institutional Baptist Church, told the crowd, "Some of us may have to go to jail if all else fails. Let's fill up and overflow [anti-immigrant Maricopa County] Sheriff Arpaio's jail. Overflow it with those for righteousness and for justice."

Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon told the crowd: "We'll go to court. We'll go to the state courts, we'll go to the federal courts, and we'll go all the way to the Supreme Court. The law is unconstitutional, the law makes it unsafe for everyone and the law will harm us economically. Most importantly, it is just plain wrong."

SB 1070 was signed on April 23 by Gov. Jan Brewer. Brewer claims the law is a necessity because of a supposed "crisis" of undocumented immigration that, she says, "the federal government has refused to fix."

The law makes it a crime for immigrants to fail to carry identification papers. It also "requires a reasonable attempt to be made to determine the immigration status of a person during any legitimate contact made by an official or agency of the state or a county, city, town or political subdivision...if reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the U.S.," according to a state government fact sheet.

In other words, Arizona police are now required to check the immigration status of anyone "suspected" of possibly being undocumented (although the law fails to specify exactly what a "reasonable suspicion" is). If police or other state officials don't follow up, the law also allows Arizona residents to sue the state for failing to abide by the letter of the law.

In addition, the new law makes it a crime for illegal immigrants to work or solicit work in Arizona or to pick up a day laborer for work if the vehicle impedes traffic. It also makes a day laborer subject to criminal charges if he or she is picked up, and the vehicle involved impedes traffic.

After signing the bill into law, Brewer claimed that its critics were "overreacting." But when asked what reasonable criteria could used to establish suspicion of someone's legal status, Brewer answered, "I don't know. I do not know what an illegal immigrant looks like."

That's precisely the problem. The law is an open invitation to racial profiling.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ACTIVISTS ARE not sitting back while the law goes into effect. This legalized bigotry is prompting a groundswell of protests across the state and the country in defense of immigrant rights.

In Tucson, for example, two rallies took place just on the day the law was signed. Motorists downtown watched as students walked out of their schools and down Congress Street to congregate outside the Federal Building in the morning. Activists from the Coalicion de Derechos Humanos (Coalition of Human Rights) said that this protest was "no one group; it was everybody."

More than 500 people, mostly students, came out with signs and bullhorns, despite the fact that the call for a protest did not go out until 10 a.m. Many of the protesters had not even been aware of the demonstration until they received a text or a Facebook invitation, or heard that their classmates were going.

As students sang "Sí, se puede, sí, sí, se puede!" motorists in the streets honked their horns in rhythm to the beat, and students responded with loud cheers. Local Tucson police scuttled around in an attempt to redirect morning traffic.

One participant said that she was "glad to catch them by surprise." As one organizer told the crowd, "We will not let them take this moment away." As the students, some as young as middle school, cheered with their hands in the air, their voices were drowned out by passing city busses honking their horns in support.

Later the same afternoon, protestors rallied at Armory Park and marched to the Federal Building with students from Tucson High. Nearly 600 people marched down Congress Street, protesting Brewer's signature on the bill.

As organizers reminded participants to stay on the sidewalks, one shouted into a bullhorn, "We are not criminals. We are a community that demands respect! They hope that 1070 will divide our community. They are wrong. We are connected in ways they will never understand."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

COMMUNITY GROUPS, students and activists have been rallying and organizing against SB 1070 since the law was first proposed. One of the most visible protests occurred on April 21 as a group of nine students chained themselves to the Capitol building and were arrested.

Another protest took place at the Capitol building a day later, and many smaller ones have happened across the state, and even outside of the state. Many more are scheduled in the days and weeks ahead.

SB 1070 does not go into effect for 90 days after the legislature closes sessions. Activists must now keep up the pressure against the state as schools close for summer.

On April 25, the Rev. Al Sharpton, announced that his National Action Network would organize "freedom walkers" to challenge the Arizona bill, just as freedom riders challenged segregation decades ago. "We will go to Arizona when this bill goes into effect and walk the streets with people who refuse to give identification and force arrest," Sharpton said Sunday in New York.

U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) is also calling on businesses and groups looking for convention and meeting locations to boycott Arizona--a call that is being taken up by many activists across the U.S.

The furor over the bill pressured President Barack Obama to criticize the law. He called it "misguided" and said that it threatens to "undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans." Obama promised to use the federal government's power to take on SB 1070.

But we can't wait on the federal government to challenge a law that will destroy lives from the day it goes into effect. This racist attack must be met with continued resistance locally and nationally. SB 1070 can become a lightning rod for building an immigrant rights movement that is already beginning to gain energy and momentum.

Tuesday, April 06, 2010

My letter to Obama

Dear President Obama,

I was thinking back to your State of the Union address and remembered how much you liked referencing the letters you received, so I thought I would give it a shot. Let me get something straight though. I did not vote for you.

“Why are you writing me a letter,” you might ask, “if you did not even vote for me?”

Because it’s six in the morning and I cannot stop crying and I don’t know what else to do.

But to answer your question a little bit more sophisticatedly maybe I did not vote for you because I was one of those disenfranchised youths that had the first opportunity to vote between George W. Bush and the pro-war, “anti-war” democratic candidate John Kerry? I think I threw my vote to the Green Party that year. Maybe I did not vote for you because I knew that you only represented corporate interests. And please, don’t tell me that you don’t. I am tired of the talk about Wall Street working for the sake of Main Street; all I know is that on my Main Street there are homeless people, and on your Wall Street there are some fat, and I mean fat, fat cats. How much money did you get from corporations that usually give money to the Republicans? A lot. But you’re right; you did get a lot of money from regular people. And if not their money then their time, their energies and their hopes. People really did believe in you and many of them still do. But you continue to peddle to the interests of big business, big pharma, and continued US military “might” and people are, honestly, becoming disillusioned in you.

And me? Well, I just didn’t think you’d be so good at what you do – that is, supporting the corporate class. I just didn’t think you would fail us so hard. Yes us, your constituents, even the ones that didn’t vote for you. I include myself amongst so many that were and are invested in you because they are just like me. I am just like them. We are all in debt, all broken hearted, all confused over the rhetoric of hard work and American Dreams, which contradict our daily experiences. It really does seem like our parents had it easier. That are grandparents seemed to travel the world a lot more. And not because they served in the military and stationed in Hawaii or Korea, but because they had the time and the means to go to Italy or San Francisco for fun. I can barely afford to watch a movie because that is ten dollars that I could use to pay for some groceries. Yeah and I get that it is not your fault that movie theaters are trying to make a profit in these “tough times.” I am just letting you know by an example what type of economic choices we make every day.

It might be worth it to tell you why I am crying this morning. I woke up to a text message from my father in law telling me that he and my mother were too swamped in debt to pay the monthly payment on a student loan that we took out years ago. I would have to work with my bank to figure out how to pay it off. It was no longer their responsibility. Okay. So maybe it isn’t their responsibility since it is a student loan my mother took out for me. But if you give me a chance I can explain why I had to take out that loan, as well as others.

I went to a top ranked private university. I got in with scholarships, grants, and loans. I was doing pretty well. Both my mom and grandma were working, well, until my grandmother was diagnosed with cancer, and then my mother was “let go” because her employer did not want to renew her contract. Mom and grandma could not help me out anymore but that was okay because there were resources for kids like me and my university seemed interested in having me. Okay, well at least for the first two years, when I got sizeable financial aid packages. Think of it like those teaser rates that mortgage companies speak so highly of. You get a good chunk of money the first year, pay a little bit here, work a part time job there, but you make it work. Next year maybe you work two part time jobs and take out a loan. Why? Because your university increased its cost of tuition six to seven percent, along with hikes in the fees and room and board. And then the state and federal financial aid ran out because as a Junior and Senior in undergraduate school you get less, if any, financial support. Maybe all that happened to you every year for four years and you graduated from a fine upstanding university with two bachelors and over fifty thousand dollars in debt. That’s what happened to me.

“Wow, two degrees. You must be smart. I bet you could have applied for outside grants,” you might admonish me.

Sure, I could have tried. But outside grants and scholarships are not based primarily on financial need. I was told point blank that my 3.6 GPA was not high enough to even try applying for grants by my financial aid counselor because those organizations or groups did not even start considering you until you had at least a 3.75.

Fannie Mae did not have a minimum GPA requirement. But she does have a 10-12% interest rates on personal student loans.

So sure Mr. Private Benefactor if you want to give your money to people who are deserved academically I salute you. But I cannot apply for your grant because I only have a 3.6 and I can’t get it any higher because I work two jobs and take five classes. Oh and by the way, the federal government refuses to allow me to work more than twenty hours a week because it would be unfair. Unfortunately, they do not seem to get that having to take out personal loans is unfair. This is a debt I may live with for the rest of my life.

I am in graduate school at another top ranked university, this time state. I’m not making that same mistake of going to a private university. But this University is in Arizona whose state legislature has a keen interest in cutting funding to all public education. I could trouble you with numbers and figures of what departments have been cut, whose paychecks have been slashed, how much the tuition has increased, and how long it takes students to actually graduate from this “four year” university. But you are a busy man and I am tired of looking at those numbers. If you would be so kind as to believe me when I say that it’s a lot then we could move forward.

One of your recent accomplishments was to get the health care bill passed. The right is telling me to fear you and the left is telling me to praise you. I’m sorry but I’m too busy worrying about what is going to happen when my department (hell, even the university) no longer has the money to pay for my health care as is guaranteed to me by contract. In the coming years my department will have to decide on whether or not to pay me or pay for my health insurance. And I, well I’ll probably have to take out more loans. But what if somehow I make it but I had to give up my health insurance? According to this new bill I would have to pay a fine for not having health care. What is it, a fine of $750? That’s how much my rent is. Would this then imply that paying a fine for not having been able to keep my health insurance is equivalent in cost and importance as keeping a roof over my head? Surely that is not what you and the other legislators had in mind. Or was it?

I have some questions about your other “achievements” as well. For instance, why does my partner, who served his four years in Iraq and Afghanistan and just recently finished his eight year contract with the US Marines Corp, not have dental? Why does he have to prove that his teeth grinding has something to do with his PTSD just so that he can get a referral to go to a dentist? You are committed to the war in Afghanistan, that “good war” that it is, and yet you seem not overly concerned with the welfare of those who come back. Your fiscal measures to stop overspending did not include the military budget but that did not translate to veterans receiving more benefits, getting bigger GI Bills. The VA did not even have enough money to give all the veterans who wanted to go to school their fair shares. They literally had to cut checks for the veterans to pick up at their local VAs. But I guess that does not concern you because your priorities, Mr. President, are being tough on terrorism. Could I be so bold as to tell you that your policies, national and abroad are terrorizing your constituents and the people internationally?

Even if you were keeping me safe from terrorism, which I don’t think you are, you are not keeping me safe from the credit card collectors, the predatory lenders. That me, again I remind you, is a we.

We are not being bailed out, the banks are. We are not getting improved health care benefits; the insurance companies are getting millions of new customers. We are not fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; nor are we invested in your war on terror because we have nothing to do with the people over there. And neither should you. The people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Haiti, they deserve more than your National Guard and predator drones. And I do mean yours; you are the Commander in Chief after all. You did decide to increase the troops to Afghanistan and you did tell us that you would end the war in Iraq. Further, our representatives do not have to choose between different health care packages, we do. They already have guaranteed health insurance. Something akin to Medicare if I remember correctly. The CEOs of Chase, Citibank, General Motors did not have to pick between their bonuses or their companies. They got to keep both. But the workers, no, they saw their coworkers laid off, their unions busted, their health plans attacked. We get to watch as the fat cats consolidate and congratulate – that is get richer and richer as we get poorer and poorer.

And what about me? Well I get to watch as the students I teach begin to learn the meaning of debt. I get to watch as their backs start to hunch, their smiles fade away as their parents are laid off, their departments are done away with, their subtle hopes and dreams bloom into fantasies because opportunities are no longer theirs. I can’t tell them that it is worth it to work hard because we are competing in a race to the bottom. I cannot tell my friends when they ask me what this health care bill means anything more than we are going to get less that costs a lot more because you wanted to be bipartisan. You wanted to keep corporate interests at heart while we just wanted to not fear being sick. I cannot tell my partner to just go back to school because he only gets one GI Bill and it would be a waste to go back to school if you don’t know what to study. What would you suggest? Business? Or maybe law?

I suggested marketing because under capitalism there is never a shortage of selling something. Sure there is a shortage of buying, although your mainstream economists don’t seem to get that. But there is a never a shortage of selling, like when you sold us your tune about repealing Don’t Ask; Don’t Tell or ending the Defense of Marriage Act. Or that other diddy about how you’d end the war in Iraq and bring our mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, sons and daughters home. Too bad that even if they did come home, they’d come home to a system that tells them that they must be sick in order to deserve attention.

It is without a doubt that you came in during a huge crisis and it is not your fault. But you sure are not helping. And the fact that you did get in was because people believed that you were different, that yes we can change the world in which we live. And people took that to heart. They took it to their school boards, to their town halls, to their workplaces, to the streets. They took it to D.C when 200,000 people marched for federal equality rights for lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, and transgenders. They took it to D.C. again when another 200,000 marched for immigrants rights. These people are not selling you a song, they are telling you: we want change.

The change they want is the change I believe in. But they change you want, does not seem to be change at all. Maybe that’s why I didn’t vote for you.

Sincerely,

Angela S.

Monday, March 15, 2010

Check out our virtual library

Thanks to Library Thing we are able to show you our selection of Haymarket Books. We have multiple copies of each book and are happy to work with you to get the book to you.

If you do not see a book from Harmarket that you are interested in, send us an email and we can add it to our collection. But please do not hesitate to place your order at Haymarket Books!

Reorganizing

The Tucson Branch of the International Socialist Organization is reorganizing itself for the Spring. Check back for updates on meeting times and events. Or contact us with questions..

Monday, January 18, 2010

More than an earthquake: a brief history of Haitian resistance and imperialist exploitation

The current crisis in Haiti is on everyone's minds with millions of Americans showing their support through vigils, sending aid or donations to relief projects on the ground. But behind the genuine efforts of people trying to help people we see the limp attempts of the American government, which promised only 100 million in aid to Haiti, and peace keeping organizations such as UN. The people of Haiti are without water, shelter, food, and medical supplies. Individuals are searching for their loved ones as makeshift clinics try to treat the wounded with bed sheets and broken furniture. Meanwhile there is no shortage of armed forces in Haiti. But the people of Haiti need food, not weapons. As Jess Hagopian said in an interview on Socialist Worker, "Emphasizing troops over aid creates a self-fulfilling prophecy that will lead to serious bloodshed."

Join us as we discuss the history of Haitian resistance and the economic policies, which have made this natural disaster into a catastrophe. Reading materials are available through Socialist Worker and the Tucson ISO branch.

Thursday January 21st 7:30pm
Main Library
University of Arizona

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Meaning of Marxism Schedule (changed)

Since we've been so busy it's been hard to finish Meaning of Marxism by Paul D'Amato. But reading this has reminded us of the need for further reading. It's time we finish the book so that we can begin our next. Everyone is welcome to join us. We can cover in discussion some of what you may have missed if you did not read the previous chapters. Copies of the book are available from the Tucson ISO branch.

Sunday, January 3rd at 7pm
6. Democracy, Reform, and Revolution
7. The Need for Socialist Organization
pages 87-119

Sunday, January 17th at 7pm - postponed till 24th
8. Russia: The God That Failed?
9. Imperialism, Nationalism, and War
pages 120-159

Sunday, January 31st at 7pm
10. Marxism and Oppression
11. Capitalism and the Environment
pages 160-189

Sunday, February 14th at 7pm
12. But What about...? Arguments against Socialism
13. Can It Happen Here?
14. Imagine ... The Future Socialist Society
Conclusion: The Point Is to Change It
pages 190-221

Meetings will be held in the Main Library at the University of Arizona.

From the decade of

From the decade of “possibilities” to a decade of resistance

Posted using ShareThis